Hamish wrote: > As for including LGPL code in the main trunk I personally don't have a > problem with that as it reflects the upstream license/author's wishes, > is new code, and is used as a library. By my reading the RFC2 doc nor > 'g.version -c' & the COPYING file need any adjustment to cover this. > But a formal decision on that may be a matter for the PSC. > > As long as everything in the lib/ccmath/ dir falls under the same (GPL > compatible) license and the LGPL.txt file is placed in that dir I'd be > happy.
If it's being included in the main GRASS tree, it would be simpler to relicense it as GPL. The main thing is to ensure that each file has a header stating that it is licensed under the LGPL. In the absence of such a header, we can't reasonably assume that any additions to the code are licensed under the LGPL. -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
