Soeren wrote:
> I have verified every step between the old and the new
> version of i.cca. The difference is only in the eigen vector
> computation.
>
> So the big question is ... which result is correct???
is it more a matter of popular convention than correctness?
i.e. does it depend on your reference frame / POV ?
> The new one looks more reasonable to me, but well this is
> only one example ... .
>
> Do i have found a bug in the numerical recipes eigen vector
> code, or is the sign of eigen vectors not fixed and changes
> with the chosen algorithm?
perhaps the output of the i.pca module, the m.eigensystem module (addons),
and R-stats can give you some confidence in one flavour over another.
I'd guess it is highly likely that you are correct and this source was
adapted from Fortran beginnings.
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
