Helena, On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Helena Mitasova <[email protected]> wrote: > Markus, > > after some testing here, > it seems that the latest fixes in v.surf.rst submitted in dev_6 branch > (grass65) work > and if there are no objections they can be included in the GRASS64 release. > The changes: > > - fixed segfault if only scol is given and other instances of wrong > combination of parameters (including having quietly interpolating > categories for 3d vector data if you forget to set layer=0, which I did > many times) > - fixed running out of memory problem for large point data sets (usually > caused problems for 10mil + points) > - added -z flag (but layer=0 still works, in case you have some scripts with > that) to interpolate the z-coordinate values
... was this ever submitted to 6.4? Would it be risky? > There is still an outstanding problem with offset2 int variable overflow (on > my machine > for rasters around 40,000x40,000), I am just waiting the hear from Glynn on > what the > correct fix is - I am hoping it is as simple as changing the type of offset2. > If anybody knows how to handle these issues properly I can post more details, I have no idea... Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
