Glynn Clements wrote:
Markus Metz wrote:
AFAIKT, r38992 Vect_get_num return long has no effect because the number of features (for each type) is stored as plus_t which is int. If you want to prepare the vector libs to support more than INT_MAX objects, I would suggest to use

plus_t Vect_get_num_primitives(const struct Map_info *, int);

etc and then think about what type is appropriate for plus_t.

I would suggest *not* to use long because long is the same like int on 32 bit (4 bytes) and the same like long long int on 64 bit (8 bytes), i.e. a vector written with 64 bit may not be readable with 32 bit which is against all the efforts to keep the vector format independent of platform/architecture/compiler. Some unsigned integer type should work, else some checks would be needed similar to what Glynn recently implemented to get an integer type of size 8 in port_init.c. E.g. use long if possible else use long long if possible else fatal error, no integer of size 8 available (or is there something else that could have a size of 8 ?).

        #ifdef HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT
        typedef long long longest;
        #else
        typedef long longest;
        #endif

?

If you're desperate for more than 32 bits, an IEEE "double" can
represent integers between -2^53 and 2^53 exactly, but this is likely
to be more trouble than it's worth (you have to be careful with
division, you can't use a double as an array index, you can't use
shifts or bitwise operators, ...).
IMHO, we should first make sure that the vector libs support up to INT_MAX (2^31 - 1) features. Vector libs LFS was a first step, and unless there is a revolutionary new hardware concept in the near future with huge amounts of RAM and much higher processing speed, building topology for so many features will take a long long time, particularly in case of areas. One solution would be to increase the speed and decrease the memory requirements of topology building, and I think more brains should be put to that task before increasing the number of supported features, i.e. changing plus_t from a 32-bit integer type to a 64-bit integer type.

Markus M
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to