Hamish wrote: > is r39284 "Implement SF_BINDING for Windows" for backport?
It doesn't matter one way or the other. I don't think it's used in either 6.x or 7.0. > does it relate to G_spawn_ex(), or just in general? (ie backport > to 6.4 too when _ex is not yet used there?) The SF_* constants are only meaningful to G_spawn_ex(). -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
