#553: wx and tcltk GUI: changing default GUI returns error ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Reporter: hamish | Owner: grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 6.4.0 Component: wxGUI | Version: 6.4.0 RCs Resolution: | Keywords: wxgui gis.m Platform: MSWindows XP | Cpu: x86-32 ---------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Comment (by glynn):
Replying to [comment:10 cmbarton]: > Does anyone know how to solve this scripts issue for Windows? I'm happy to implement something but don't understand how to fix this. It seems to me that it is something that needs to be done somewhere outside the GUI. If so, we should probably change the "component" to whatever component is the right place to fix Windows ability to read these scripts. The core issue is that Windows decides how to "run" scripts via the extension, not the shebang. If you want to support the most general case, all scripts must have an appropriate extension, e.g. .sh for Bourne shell scripts. Even then, we're dependent upon the file associations being set correctly (on Unix, we're dependent upon /bin/sh being a Bourne shell, but that's a much safer assumption). We can get more limited support either by relying upon MSys or by implementing similar emulation ourselves (i.e. writing a utility to identify whether a command is an exe or a script and invoking the appropriate interpreter). Either way, g.parser needs to be changed to match. One option is to back-port the -s switch used by Python scripts, and to add similar functionality for Bourne-shell scripts (i.e. write out environment settings in a form that can be "eval"d). But that would require changing the g.parser boilerplate in existing shell scripts. Aside from that, when invoking commands via subprocess.Popen, ensure that you use shell=True on Windows. Without that, it will only work for binaries (.exe and .com), not for scripts (which includes .bat files). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/553#comment:11> GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev