I agree with Martin...I think. But maybe rewriting the current script and getting rid of the xmon stuff would get us 90% of the way there. I'm wondering if what should be done is to just rewrite the point/line parts of the script and leave the choropleth maps to d.thematic.area. d.thematic.area has a few rough edges, but overall it is a powerful tool.
A reason to make a script that includes the point/line thematic mapping AND wraps d.thematic.area into one tool is to get the legend. Currently d.thematic.area writes d.graph instructions for the legend. A script could grab those and turn them into a nice legend in a wxPython canvas. Or, I suppose we could just write a separate script to do that. Michael On Feb 22, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Martin Landa wrote: > 2010/2/22 Glynn Clements <[email protected]>: > >> Does it actually need a monitor? If not, I can remove those parts and >> convert the rest to Python. > > I think it could be better to rewrite it from scratch. To post the > script to Python is probably waste of energy. > > Martin > > -- > Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
