Martin Landa wrote: > >> anyway from user POV width=0 seems quite strange I guess. > > > > XDRIVER passes the line width directly to XChangeGC. X specifies the > > precise behaviour for non-zero line width, but drivers have some > > freedom as to how zero-width lines are handled, so they can use the > > hardware's "thin line" drawing primitive, if it has one. A width of > > zero can potentially result in significantly faster operation. > > OK, so should I revert the changes?
I think that the default line width should be zero, i.e. "thin" lines. On drivers where there is no such thing as a "thin" line, the driver will use a sensible default (which might not be the same as "1"). -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
