On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: > Paul wrote: ... >> I haven't had time to test reverting the CSV files yet but
(I wonder how CSV files could mess up a logic but how knows... Of course let's revert in 6.4 if this breaks things) (it also reminds me of my suggestion to leave all this business to GDAL instead of having a potentially conflicting private solution, but of course one can see it also the other way round) >> if that works I would suggest doing it, as if that is going >> to be the way GDAL works from now on it will require quite a >> few changes to how g.proj works, and it is much too late in >> the release cycle of 6.4.0 to go changing things there... Sure. Note: if so, it is the first time that CSV updates really break the mechanism in GRASS. > hmmm +file lib/proj/datum_shift.csv > in https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/41248 > > see also r41223. FrankW has published a blog with details: http://fwarmerdam.blogspot.com/2010/03/in-last-few-weeks-i-believe-i-have-made.html Perhaps that's giving more insights. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
