Hamish wrote: > (beware if working with 0.0<1.0 values that use= might cast to int(??))
never mind, that's incorrect. it's fine. (tested with slope*0.01 but not
extreme log data [which in raw form probably suffers from FP precision
storage issues of its own])
there does seem to be a minor precision issue with the range check though.
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
