Martin Landa wrote: > >> It looks like I'm going to have to add a local copy of ctypesgen in > >> order to ensure consistent behaviour. > > > > with a local copy of ctypesgen it's working. > > I would vote to backport ctypes to devbr6. Concerning relbr64 we could > probably disable swig for 6.4.0 and later backport ctypes for 6.4.1. > What do you think about that?
Is there a reason not to add the ctypes stuff to 6.4.0? Even if there are problems with it, they shouldn't interfere with the other Python code (i.e. grass.script). -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
