Dylan wrote:
> There are times were dumping the results from v.rast.stats
> to a file is more efficient than uploading to an attribute
> table. Would anyone be interested in a slight modification to
> v.rast.stats that would allow this? Also, would it be worth
> putting in the time to implement this in sh, when python is the
> future? Therefore, would it make sense to replace the sh
> version in GRASS65 with a modified version of the python script
> from GRASS7?

do both?

better: rewrite in C.


Hamish



      
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to