Hamish: > > how do the two compare performance wise? are the options/ > > flags 100% backwards compatible? give identical results?
Markus Metz: > We (you and me and others) had this exact discussion > previously. > Excerpts from the previous discussion: > > v.rast.stats does not scale at all, for e.g. 10000 areas it > is completely useless whereas v.rast.stats2 is 10000x faster, ok, thanks for the refresher. Mainly I am interested to know if the replacement preserves backwards compatibility both in terms of CLI and (meaingful) numerical results, and if it doesn't, what work is needed so that it does. i.e. to the end-user will the upgrade be invisible except that it runs a lot faster now? cheers, Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
