Hi, 2011/10/20 Sören Gebbert <[email protected]>: > So i would like to keep t.*, tr.*, tv.* and tr3.* as prefix to simply > identify the new datatypes, extending the common r.*, v.* and r3.* > prefixes with a "t".
historically there are prefixes like g., r., v. or r3. From this point of view it would be good to keep spatio-temporal functionality under one prefix. It's just introducing to many new prefix compared to the number of existing prefixes. Just my personal opinion. I would like to open discussion to avoid renaming of modules later in the future. We need to make decision in early stage of development. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
