Martin Landa wrote: > > I know that this solution doesn't follow the idea of calling modules > > (and not using library directly), but now it seems to be much easier > > to do this change than rewrite parts of wxGUI which uses ctypes. > > I am afraid that rewriting such wxGUI components with the number of > active developers (GRASS or better to wxGUI only) it's quite > unrealistic task.
Leaving things as it is and hoping that the reliability issues "go away" is even more unrealistic. At least a re-write will eventually result in a solution. > Moreover it would go against the integration > efforts. It would basically mean to separate eg. vector digitizer to > the standalone application similarly how worked old-fashioned > `v.digit` module. It means to make step(s) back (in my POV) and to > split the whole wxGUI to more standalone applications. The alternative is something which cannot help but be unreliable. -- Glynn Clements <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
