Hello, I'm not in the mood to digg deeply into this concept. It looks similar to R packages, right? Can we borrow most of (design) from R to not reinvent the wheel and to learn from their mistakes/success?
Also, if we have an option to start a new, why limit ourselves to single or double letter as toolbox prefix? I assume, all modules in a toolbox should have a common prefix, like hy.flow, right? Just drinking morning tea, Maris. 2012/1/2 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I have added (r50024) very initial support of "toolboxes idea" (see > [1] for detailed information) to `g.extension` (see notes at wiki > [2]). Any feedback, support, improvements welcomed. > > Martin > > [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/Toolboxes > [2] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/Toolboxes#Managing_toolboxes > > -- > Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
