2012/1/4 Markus Metz <[email protected]>: > 2012/1/4 Sören Gebbert <[email protected]>: >> 2012/1/4 Martin Landa <[email protected]>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> 2011/12/31 Sören Gebbert <[email protected]>: >>>>> great! Just a small note, maybe we should follow same naming >>>>> convention, see `r.resamp.interp`. >>>> >>>> Oh what a pity, "interpol" sounds so cool and is IMHO more intuitive >>>> than "interp" ... and its the name of an international agency. :) >>>> So should we rename "interp" into "interpol" or "interpol" into "interp"?
Perhaps interpol is slightly more intuitive but... ... > First come first serve. r.resamp.interp was there first, and interp is > used in various places as abbreviation for interpolation, thus I would > opt for r.series.interp. ... I tend to agree with Markus M here: if we change that tons of links, documents, tutorials (and user memories) etc would have to be updated. So I believe that adapting the new to the existing name is better. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
