Hi, submission rules shouldn't change too often and thus maintaining two versions (GRASS 6 vs 7) shouldn't be a huge issue. Keeping them with source has a benefit of being able to distribute them with source :)
Are there any other benefits besides "updating two versions"? Just my 0.002 Verizon cents, Maris. 2012. gada 13. aprīlis 01:53 Martin Landa <[email protected]> rakstīja: > Hi, > > currently we need to maintain submission rule files in three different > branches (trunk, devbr6, relbr64). I would suggest to move these > documents from SVN to trac, similarly to GDAL [1]. In our case > something like > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingC > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingPython > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingDocs > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingBash > > or > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingRules/C > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/submittingRules/Python > ... > > What's your opinion? > > Martin > > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc8_devguide > > -- > Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
