On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: > Markus Metz wrote: >> IMHO, it would make maintenance much easier if one of 6.4 and >> 6.5 would go rather sooner than later. > > I absolutely and quite strongly disagree. It is invaluable to have > a staging area to test backports
Here I have severe doubts that this happens. Can you demonstrate that things are significantly tested? I don't see this. Here your promised backports, all TODO: https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/192 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1690 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/91 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1513 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1315 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1312 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/1142 https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/335 If these backports never happen (I cannot take care of all of them) then 6.5 is superfluous. Furthermore: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/173 http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/175 https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/778 MarkusN _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
