>I agree that the quality of the r.stream.* modules is out of question.
these are very nice and useful modules with high quality. > For what concerns including it into the core, I would like to point you > out the discussion [1] about the > concept of toolboxes. The general orientation is not to include field > specific groups of modules into > the core and make them available in an easy way when required. but how can we guide "normal" users that such interesting tools are in the addons? ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/could-r-stream-become-part-of-GRASS-core-tp5000607p5016768.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
