On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]> wrote: > (re-structured the last post, cc-ed András B, E. Jorge T -- someone is not on > the list?) > > Nikos: > >> >> > It seems there are several modifications to the MET content structure. >> >> > Fortunately (?) two MET files are provided *currently* (at least I have >> >> > seen this in several L[MTE][457] scenes. > .. > > Nikos: > >> > I tried to compare variable definitions in the landsat_met.c file with the >> > diff "TLold.txt_VS_MTL.txt" file (metadata that correspond to a LT5 >> > scene). The differences I see are the following: > >> > - SPACECRAFT_ID: was Landsat5, is: LANDSAT_5 >> > - SENSOR_ID: *this is the same* > >> > - ACQUISITION_DATE: renamed (?) to "DATE_ACQUIRED" >> > - CREATION_TIME: was (?) PRODUCT_CREATION_TIME, is: FILE_DATE > >> > - SUN_ELEVATION: was not existing (!), is: same >> > - BAND%_GAIN: nowhere to be found as is, was (?): >> > CORRECTION_METHOD_GAIN_BAND%, is: CORRECTION_GAIN_BAND_% > >> > - LMAX_BAND%: renamed to RADIANCE_MAXIMUM_BAND_% >> > - LMIN_BAND%: same as above, renamed to RADIANCE_MINIMUM_BAND_% > >> > - QCALMAX_BAND%: renamed to QUANTIZE_CAL_MAX_BAND_% >> > - QCALMIN_BAND: same as above, renamed to QUANTIZE_CAL_MIN_BAND_% > >> > Is this enough to get i.landsat.toar working? > > Yann Chemin: > >> Try to add an additional strcmp() case where ACQUISITION_DATE is >> changed to DATE_ACQUIRED > >> sorry I am very busy these few coming days...
The original changes I got from Jorge I attach again. Should they be submitted to SVN? Markus
landsat_met.c.diff
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
