On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: > Comment(by martinl): >> The result will the same. Please bear in mind, that you are >> probably only one from devs who really wants to keep `develbranch_6` alive. > > I'm not into making threats or big ego shows so I'll just say the way it is. > I see my long term > role with GRASS as gardening the stable branch, making sure bug fixes get > implemented, > tested, & sync'd, etc.
The latter doesn't seem to happen too much (and as mentioned, in the past years I made *several* full comparisons with the respective backports of which I am getting tired): [neteler@north ~]$ diff -ru --exclude=".svn" --exclude="*.html" --exclude="*.po" grass64_release grass65_release > grass64_release.grass65_release.diff [neteler@north ~]$ grep 'diff -ru ' grass64_release.grass65_release.diff | wc -l 425 grep 'diff -ru ' grass64_release.grass65_release.diff | cut -d' ' -f7 | cut -d'/' -f2- > grass64.grass65.diff.filelist.txt -> attached Quite a few differences... I wonder who will backport the relevant fixes. Markus
grass64.grass65.diff.filelist.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
