Thinking about the style of keywords.html page, I discovered that the h2 and h3 have the same font-size in CSS [1]. Is it an intention?
And about the style itself. I would suggest to use description (dl) instead of bullet list. The change in code is small but I don't want to do it without asking others. [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/grassdocs.css On 12 March 2013 11:43, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/03/13 11:21, Markus Neteler wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Moritz Lennert >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I haven't followed this close enough, but could someone explain the >>> difference between the two ? >> >> >> Just open both :) >> >> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/keywords.html >> http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/topics.html >> >>> And why (as an example) r.kappa should be in >>> the classification as keyword list and not in the classification as topic >>> list ? >> >> >> 1) The raster/vector/... pages depend on the *first* keyword. >> >> 2) The topics.html page(s) depends *only* on the second keyword. >> >> 3) The new keywords.html shows *all* keywords. > > > Except for the major (blacklisted) ones such as raster, vector, display, > etc. > > So, the main difference is how many keywords are used. I still believe that > one such page should be enough (and more will create confusion), and I think > keywords.html is the way to go (more complete, easy to use). But if others > see a use in topics.html, I won't make a fight of it ;-) > > Moritz > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
