On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Anna Kratochvílová <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2013/3/21 Markus Metz <[email protected]>: >>> What is the reason to have a spin control for floating point values? >>> Could the spin control at least not use the number but the significant >>> digits (same like printing with %g) for spinning? E.g. for 0.00000001 >>> I see 0.000 which is wrong. IMHO the spin control should be reverted >>> to text input. >> >> sometimes float spin controls are useful sometimes not. Useful eg. >> `d.vect size`, but not for the case you mentioned. Probably we could >> stay with floating spin control (some improvements required) rather >> than plain text input. No strong opinion here. >> > > Because we don't know the meaningful number of digits, I agree to use > text input. Changing the float spin might be too much work and I think > it is not worth it. I have changed it in r55484.
Thanks! That means we can change the r.terraflow default for d8cut back to infinity which is a valid number (#1888)? Markus M > > Anna _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
