I have no problem migrating to 2.9, but I thought it was not working correctly 
yet.

Is it OK for all current versions--6.4.2, 6.5, 7.0?

Michael
____________________
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity 
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Arizona State University

voice:  480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC)
fax:          480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu











On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu>
 wrote:

> 
> On Jun 8, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Michael Barton wrote:
> 
>> I've been staying with wxPython 2.8.x Perhaps some of the new code only 
>> works correctly in 2.9?
> 
> that is the message I have been getting, Helena
>> 
>> Michael
>> ____________________
>> C. Michael Barton
>> Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity 
>> Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
>> Arizona State University
>> 
>> voice:       480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-727-9746 (CSDC)
>> fax:          480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
>> www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 8:39 PM, William Kyngesburye <wokl...@kyngchaos.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I just compiled trunk, no compile errors, and GUI runs fine.
>>> 
>>> OSX 10.7 Lion, Xcode 4.6.2 command line tools, wxPython 2.9.4
>>> 
>>> I'm a bit lost now - what is the status of this, what is the current 
>>> problem?
>>> 
>>> On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Michael Barton wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Maybe it is PYTHONPATH
>>>> 
>>>> BUT...
>>>> 
>>>> Python and the GUI is compiling and working just fine otherwise. And 
>>>> Python runs with no problem in the terminal.
>>>> 
>>>> The bogus errors for compiling mapswipe, composer, etc first appeared with 
>>>> what I think was the introduction of a new window class for these modules. 
>>>> I have not seen the toolbox, but it may reuse the same code. If I knew 
>>>> what this new code is, I might be able to troubleshoot it. But I don't 
>>>> have time to try to reverse engineer it without guidance as to where to 
>>>> look. The error on importing wx is misleading as to what the real error 
>>>> is. 
>>>> 
>>>> I can't say for sure that these are all related (and the error is indeed 
>>>> somewhat different for the toolbox compilation). But it seems a reasonable 
>>>> place to start.
>>>> 
>>>> If it IS a PYTHONPATH problem, then the code for building the toolbox is 
>>>> somehow ignoring PYTHONPATH because this is set properly otherwise.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Anna,
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is from the log. It looks to me like a path problem during 
>>>>> compilation
>>>>> 
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>> File "tools/build_modules_xml.py", line 85, in <module>
>>>>>  sys.exit(main())
>>>>> File "tools/build_modules_xml.py", line 77, in main
>>>>>  header(fh)
>>>>> File "tools/build_modules_xml.py", line 58, in header
>>>>>  import grass.script.core as grass
>>>>> ImportError: No module named grass.script.core
>>>>> make[1]: *** 
>>>>> [/Users/Shared/grass_dev/grass7_dev/dist.x86_64-apple-darwin12.3.0/etc/gui/wxpython/xml/module_items.xml]
>>>>>  Error 1
>>>>> make: [default] Error 2 (ignored)
>>>>> make xml/menudata.xml
>>>>> make[1]: `xml/menudata.xml' is up to date.
>>>>> make menustrings.py
>>>>> 
>>>>> The other bogus errors on "No module named wx" also seems like a path 
>>>>> problem.
>>>>> 
>>>>> yes, problem might be in PYTHONPATH. Could you ask about this William? I 
>>>>> have currently no time and I am probably not able to solve this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Anna 
>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 6, 2013, at 2:39 AM, Anna Petrášová <kratocha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi, Michael,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> OK. I did this remotely but hopefully it is what you need.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> yes, perfect, thanks. Could you try the compilation again with the 
>>>>>> change William did recently (demolocation probem, [1])? It might be 
>>>>>> related because from the errors in the log it seems that the virtual 
>>>>>> grass session is not there. If the problem is still there, please send 
>>>>>> me updated compilation log.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Anna
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/56621 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----
>>> William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
>>> http://www.kyngchaos.com/
>>> 
>>> "The beast is actively interested only in now, and, as it is always now and 
>>> always shall be, there is an eternity of time for the accomplishment of 
>>> objects."
>>> 
>>> - the wisdom of Tarzan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> grass-dev mailing list
>> grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to