On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> wrote: > > I'd suggest using: > > int exp; > new_snap = frexp(xmax, &exp); > exp -= 52; > new_snap = ldexp(new_snap, exp); > > frexp() and ldexp() are C89, don't introduce rounding errors, and > handle zero correctly (they're also likely to be more efficient, but > that's a trivial detail).
Thanks for the suggestion, done in all branches. Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
