On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Hamish <hamis...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Markus Metz wrote: > >> In this case, would it be ok to enforce umask to 0022 in the start up >> script? > > two rules to thumb: > > we shouldn't restrict others to the limits of our own imagination. > (if someone wants to set their umask to allow 777 for whatever reason > or need, why not let them?) > > it's not broken == don't fix it > > > ... my suggestion is just leave the thing alone. why make work for people?
Just to clarify, I no longer want to enforce permissions inside GRASS, but will instead enforce permissions on system level, outside GRASS. Maybe our shared network GRASS data are a special case. Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev