I thought they are in the addons. If not, please feel free to move them there. 
And thanks again for looking at these. I'm glad they're useful.

Michael
____________________
C. Michael Barton
Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity 
Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Arizona State University

voice:  480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC)
fax:          480-965-7671 (SHESC),  480-727-0709 (CSDC)
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu












On Sep 15, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> On 14/09/13 21:01, Michael Barton wrote:
>> Moritz,
>> 
>> This is a nice addition.
> 
> 
> Actually, not that nice. I just reread one of the papers you give as 
> reference [1] and it clearly states that the equation that you use for 
> estimating the expected mean nearest neighbor distance "cannot be used for 
> irregularly shaped study areas"...
> 
> 
>> Thanks, I'm really swamped right now. Do you want to add it to the script 
>> and add your name to the authors?
> 
> 
> I'll see what else I can find in the literature about how to calculate the 
> expected mean distance to see if having the actual study area measures is 
> really useful. If yes, I'll add the patch myself.
> 
> BTW, shouldn't the scripts v.nn.py and v.lda.py go into the addons svn ? If 
> you agree then I can add them there, with or without my patch. I've also 
> locally modified v.lda.py a bit to allow easier (to me at least) use of the 
> results.
> 
> 
> Moritz
> 
> [1] http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~dongmei/ppa/ppa.html
> 
>> 
>> Michael Barton
>> School of Human Evolution&Social Change
>> Center for Social Dynamics&  Complexity
>> Arizona State University
>> 
>> ...Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2013, at 9:11 AM, "Moritz Lennert"<[email protected]>  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Michael,
>>> 
>>> I've attached a patch to your very useful v.nn.py addon script. The patch 
>>> provides the following:
>>> 
>>> - a change of option names from input1,2 to 'from' and 'to'
>>> - the possibility to provide a vector map with polygons giving the contours 
>>> of the study area for which to calculate the nearest neighbor coefficient - 
>>> the script just gets the total of all areas and all perimeters in the given 
>>> map
>>> - the possibility to provide numerical values for area and perimeter
>>> 
>>> Even though some people argue that the absolute value of the coefficient 
>>> does not mean much and that the exact size of the study area does not have 
>>> an influence on the relative values of the coefficient, I think it is a 
>>> plus to have the possibility to circumscribe the area. Especially since in 
>>> its current state the module gets the area and perimenter from the current 
>>> region and as this is a vector module most people won't even think about 
>>> region settings. (Running the module in the default n=1 s=0 w=0 e=1 region 
>>> gives very weird coefficient values.
>>> 
>>> Up to you to decide whether you want to add this into your script.
>>> 
>>> BTW: the script works perfectly in grass7 as well.
>>> 
>>> Moritz
>>> <v.nn.py.diff>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to