On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Vaclav Petras wrote: > > > I have no suggestion but I just experienced problem with options. > > > > I have options: > > * elevation > > * end_water_level > > > > So, when I write > > elev=... end_wl=... > > I get > > Sorry, <elev=> is ambiguous > > Can you try r58034? > > This should ignore ambiguities if the given option is a prefix of > exactly one recognised option. > > It reports still the same (I did the distclean to be sure). I wrote a small script to test it (attached). I'm just not sure how to effectively run it (without copying it into my dist.../scripts) and we should probably integrated it into the library (library's test code). Thanks, Vaclav We might need something similar for option names. > > -- > Glynn Clements <[email protected]> >
r.test.param.py
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
