On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > 2013/11/4 Glynn Clements <[email protected]>: > > > > Martin Landa wrote: > > > >> >> But I'm not able to decide on which occasion I want which function. > >> >> Someday, I can try to call both functions with different map/mapset > >> >> combinations but reading from manual would be more effective. > >> > > >> > Please use G_find_raster2() always (similarly for the other G_find_* > >> > functions). G_find_raster() exists for backward compatibility only. > >> > Having it modify the map name in-place has been the source of > >> > countless bugs. > >> > >> it would be probably better to replace G_find_raster() by > >> G_find_raster2() in G7. Any objections? > > > > Not from me. For code which specifically needs an unqualified name, > > use G_unqualified_name() or G_name_is_fully_qualified(). > > perfect, is there any volunteer for this job? Unfortunately I will not > find time for that not earlier than in some weeks. And we should also > check other V2() functions. > > Same here, maybe, in the meantime, I will add the depreciated attribute there, that should be quick and it would be good to test it anyway. Martin > > -- > Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
