On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu> wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2014/1/19 Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu>: >>> Maybe it just waits for somebody to put it there, we would like to see it >>> in the core as well.
r.stream.extract is already in core, the other modules are scheduled to follow. >> >> it's not only question of "putting it here". The modules need some >> review (code, parameters, manuals). I will be able to help with this >> procedure in some days. There will be hopefully more people >> interested. Martin > > If that is the case, that is a completely different issue, I thought they are > ready. I agree with Martin that the modules need some review. E.g. I encountered a bug in r.stream.order where some stream segments got order 0 (zero) which is invalid. I am also interested in having these modules in core and want to help with the review as soon as I find some time... Markus M > We can look at how much work it would be. > > Then what about v.transects - it has been updated to grass7 and tested in > class and has a manual and testing report available. > Can this module go to core? How do we make the decision for "ready to go" > modules? > > Helena > > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
