On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Moritz Lennert < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 28/01/14 16:00, Margherita Di Leo wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'd like to bring a proposal for the forthcoming GSoC, that is the >> support for INSPIRE. This proposal is twofold, one regarding the >> metadata support, the other regarding the support for the data >> transformation to meet the inspire schema. I would like to know your >> opinion before drafting the idea into the trac. I'm willing to mentor >> for the INSPIRE POV, and since I'm working at JRC I have the opportunity >> to take advantage of a direct contact with the very people who are >> developing the Directive. Martin Landa kindly made himself available to >> co-mentor from the GRASS POV. >> > > +1, but I think we should aim for generic metadata handling and then allow > the use of specific schemas such as INSPIRE. > > INSPIRE is using some more general ISO standards, isn't it? QGIS metatools is a nice example of such a generic tool allowing for > specification of different schemas and for different outputs through the > use of XSLT conversion. > > QGIS compatibility would be appreciated by a lot of users and it might even show the way to go. Some other thing to consider is how this metadata support would interact with existing r.support, r.timestamp etc. I remember that Yann and NikosA was talking about this in Genova in 2013. Vaclav Moritz > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
