On 12/02/14 17:28, Vaclav Petras wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
2014-02-12 13:41 GMT+01:00 Nikos Alexandris <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>:
[...]
> think of simply using "r.statistics2" and providing an input
"cover=" map
btw, it remembers me that we haven't yet decided about renaming
`r.statistics2` and `r.statistics3` to any reasonable name...
And they confuses with r.stats and r.univar. And r.univar is the most
basic one from these, I would say, and has the most cryptic name.
Is the merging (some of) them together still an option?
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/grass-dev/2013-June/064634.html
In summary: r.statistics can be replaced by r.statistics2 and
r.statistics3, with both of them renamed (none of them calculates the
mode though, but I guess that could be added to r.statistics2, for
integer cover maps).
r.stats and r.univar are different.
Hamish' suggested r.stats.summary for r.stats, but in my eyes r.univar
provides more of a "summary" than r.stats. I don't have a better
proposal, though. Maybe r.stats.binned ?
Moritz
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
