On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > <ul> > > <li>Parameter <b>newparam</b> added in GRASS 7.1. > > </ul> > > > > What do you think? > > ... I dunno with that level of detail: I would use the energy to first > get the manual pages complete, i.e. adding examples where still > missing. Hm, I can see that it can be useful sometimes. For example, Python have this for each function which in our case might be closer to parameters/options then to modules, in terms of level of details. However, if I should choose between examples in manual and version for each parameter/option, I choose the example. Speaking about examples, each module, in my opinion, should have also and image in manual even if it does not convey any important information as in case of `r.in.lidar`. http://grass.osgeo.org/grass70/manuals/r.in.lidar.html
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
