On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Pietro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> > wrote: > > [cut] I'm also afraid of introducing another markup (we have now HTML > > for doc and HTML+Markdown+Doxygen+Doxygen-LaTeX-like for programming), > > although reStructuredText is almost Python standard. But anyway, I think > > that using Sphinx and reStructuredText for Python will be beneficial. > > > Sphinx has support for python/C/C++/javascript [0]. > May be we could reconsider [1] to move everything under sphinx. > > But I'm not sure it is feasible. > > Doxygen has support for Python too, but it is not good enough, I would guess that it is the same for C in Sphinx. The only thing which could change this is Breathe [2]. More investigation is needed in this case (as well as in replacement? of HTML manual with Sphinx). > [0] http://sphinx-doc.org/domains.html > [1] https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/151 [2] http://michaeljones.github.io/breathe/
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
