I agree. Maybe, Markus M has a better idea why we needed r60149?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Martin Landa <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-05-13 20:06 GMT+02:00 Huidae Cho <[email protected]>: > > but in trunk, r60149 replaced it with > > then we should discuss about backporting such change instead of quick > fixing in relbr70 (without explanation)... Martin >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
