Sure. I'll do that later today. On May 18, 2014 7:22 AM, "Helmut Kudrnovsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Huidae Cho wrote > > I didn't do much backporting till now. I think it's time to read that > wiki > > page. Thanks! > > > > > > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:51 AM, Martin Landa < > > > landa.martin@ > > > >wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> 2014-05-18 11:49 GMT+02:00 Martin Landa < > > > landa.martin@ > > > >: > >> > please consider backporting such trivial changes to relbr70... [1]. > >> > >> see also http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/HowToBackport > >> > >> It's seems that you do not consider any backporing till now... > >> > >> Martin > >> > >> -- > >> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > grass-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > > IMHO r60308 "r.stream.*: Name of input/Name for output" should also be > considered to be backported to relbr70. > > > > ----- > best regards > Helmut > -- > View this message in context: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-GRASS-SVN-r60304-grass-trunk-raster-r-colors-tp5140994p5141000.html > Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
