Hi, I was syncing with G_OPT_C_FG, which has "standard color name". I don't have a strong opinion against "standard GRASS color name" as long as G_OPT_C_FG and G_OPT_C_BG have the same wording, but I'm not so sure if we really need to say "GRASS" when we're using GRASS. For example, even "mapset/region" should be "GRASS mapset/region" then? No other standard options had "GRASS" other than G_OPT_C_BG. Why do you think this case can be more confusing than other GRASS specific words? Just wondering.
Huidae On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 5:31 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - _("Either a standard GRASS color, R:G:B triplet, or >> \"none\""); >> + _("Either a standard color name, R:G:B triplet, or \"none\""); >> > > I definitively agree with adding "name" there. However, I'm not so sure > about leaving "GRASS" out because it is not clear what is "standard color > name". Which standard? DVI, SVG, CSS? Even leaving out "standard" would > make sense since "GRASS color name" is enough, I would say. >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
