2014-05-26 9:05 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi <[email protected]>: > On 23 May 2014 19:02, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I don't think that grass-addons are appropriate. I consider grass-addons as >> extension/addon/plugin repository, so thinks which you can install into >> GRASS make sense there. r3.flow definitely does. I'm not so sure about >> testing framework or metadata. sandbox make seems like more appropriate in >> this case (no structure required or expected). >> >> sandbox/gsoc >> sandbox/gsoc/2014/ >> sandbox/gsoc/2014/metadata >> > > +1 for use sandbox...
agreed, Martin _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
