Hi, G_option_to_separator supports tab, \\t, and newline. Do we need \\n? I don't think so because we can use newline. Maybe delete \\t for consistency and use tab only? On May 30, 2014 1:40 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - if (strcmp(delim_opt->answer, "\\t") == 0) >> - *delim = G_store("\t"); >> > > > About r60612 and r60613, they are great. But I just noted a changed > interface for some of the modules because they supported also `\t` for tab > besides `tab`. > > if (strcmp(delim_opt->answer, "\\t") == 0) > *delim = G_store("\t"); > > Either parser should support this or this should go to the change of the > interface in 7 wiki page. > > When we are on it what about \n, do we want this or not. I would say that > both \t and \n might be helpful but \n can be dangerous sometimes. > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
