g.gui.metadata is the most clear to me.

Doug


On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2014-06-30 9:37 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi <[email protected]>:
> > I think that g.gui.editor it is not so clear, could you rename it to
> > g.gui.metadata or g.gui.metaeditor?
>
> right, `g.gui.metadata` seems to be the most appropriate, Martin
>
>
> --
> Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>



-- 
Doug Newcomb
USFWS
Raleigh, NC
919-856-4520 ext. 14 [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
Interior.   Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to