g.gui.metadata is the most clear to me. Doug
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-06-30 9:37 GMT+02:00 Luca Delucchi <lucadel...@gmail.com>: > > I think that g.gui.editor it is not so clear, could you rename it to > > g.gui.metadata or g.gui.metaeditor? > > right, `g.gui.metadata` seems to be the most appropriate, Martin > > > -- > Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Doug Newcomb USFWS Raleigh, NC 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the Interior. Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
