(back to very old task) On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > (back to old task) > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Paul > Kelly<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Markus Neteler wrote: >> >>>> I think we can remove the files and the associated stuff you mentioned if >>>> these conditions are true: >>>> * The .csv files are always installed by default with GDAL >>>> * A GDAL installation is not considered a working installation if these >>>> files are not present >>> >>> I have no idea if the conditions are true... >> >> Me neither. I think perhaps we should experimentally remove the files in 7.x >> and let GDAL find them itself, and see if there are any problems reported. I >> will do that when I get some time. > > OK, I'll leave that to you (Paul).
This issue is still open I think. Did anyone dare to to locally remove the CSV files and continue using GRASS 7? >>> Since there are new additional CSV files which haven't been there before I >>> also don't know if to add those or not. >> >> Well they look like they might be relevant, and it can't do any harm to add >> them, so I think for 6.x we should add them just in case they are really >> needed by the more recent versions of GDAL. > > I have update the files to EPSG 7.1 from GDAL/data/ in 6.4, 6.5 and 7. > >> So - a little more complexity for now, but hopefully if there are no >> problems we can simplify all this for 7.x. Perhaps we need to manage all this via trac ticket? Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
