On Oct 1, 2014 11:49 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Markus Metz <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Huidae Cho <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hmm... I "remove"d g.list/g.remove and "rename"d g.mlist/g.mremove. Maybe, >> > there is a better way? >> >> Did you "remove" or "svn remove"? Same for "rename". I guess you did >> "svn [remove|rename]", and some other people did not "make distclean" >> before "svn up". FWIW, I had no problems with your changes, doing >> "make distclean" before "svn up". >> >> Whoever compiles GRASS from source and wants the latest and greatest >> (svn up), must clean the source code first with "make distclean" >> before recompiling. This applies to all 4 branches. This is not GRASS >> specific but the way how svn works.
In this case it failed. In my cronjob on grass.osgeo.org there well is 'make distclean' but the two directories remained wrong unless fixed manually. markusN > make distclean or just make clean, this might be it. The message from SVN was not much helpful, although it changed from the previous version. > > But usually you don't have to do make *clean, so how to know these things ahead (except for looking at Trac)? I don't know. Or is there some option in SVN (from the options you are given) to use "theirs all" as it was in previous SVN version (I don't know which)? > >> >> Markus M >> >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> ... >> >>> > Confirmed, I had to do the same in all copies too some time ago. SVN is >> >>> > not >> >>> > really good at renaming and deleting things, it is always confused and >> >>> > I >> >>> > really don't understand why I need to do revert. >> >>> >> >>> As this almost never happened, it may have been this specific commit >> >>> being different from others. >> >>> Whatever, the solution we have. >> >>> >> >> Oh, now I hope it was not because I recommended some Git-like procedure to >> >> Huidae which is not really what SVN wanted. Anyway, it was easy to solve >> >> although it required manual intervention to automatic builds (at least the >> >> one for tests). >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Markus >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> grass-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > grass-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
