On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Markus Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Vaclav Petras <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Markus and others, > >> > >> I would do a backport or r61812 but I'm not sure if it works correctly. > It > >> seems to work and I got the same results as with the old version but I > >> remember that you (Markus) had some doubts at one point. Now I actually > see > >> that you said you will backport it, so if you have your plan disregard > this > >> message. > > > > Please backport it. > > ... after removing the C++ style comment in raster/r.li/r.li.daemon/avl.c. > > Done. It was double wrong, it was just the old code which I forgot to delete. Anyway, I'm not sure if there is some reason not to use C++ comments since we mostly relay on POSIX capable compiler (which will probably handle //, just a guess). http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/62280 > Markus M > > > > It should probably also go into G6 which is almost > > identical. > > > >> I also wanted to use the things bellow to write a test but I don't know > how. > > > > Would this script give some ideas? > > raster/r.li/r.li.testing_nc_asc.sh > > > > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > > grass-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
