Nikos Alexandris wrote: > > I have this script > > <https://github.com/NikosAlexandris/i.fusion.hpf.py>. My local > > Makefile, with which I am trying to compile currently, is: > > MODULE_TOPDIR = ../.. > > > > PGM = i.fusion.hpf > > > > ETCFILES = high_pass_filter constants > > > > include $(MODULE_TOPDIR)/include/Make/Script.make > > include $(MODULE_TOPDIR)/include/Make/Python.make > > * Is the order of entries in ETCFILES significant? (high_pass_filter > > needs stuff from constants) > > * While both files are to be found, after compilation, under > > </grass70/dist.x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/etc/i.fusion.hpf>, the script > > runs fine only when executing it from *any*, if I understand > > correctly, directory in which the helper file(s) > > "high_pass_filter.py(c)" is(are) in. > > I can't work this out. Thank you, Nikos > > Thanks to "r.in.wms", fixed by using this line: > > +sys.path.insert(1, os.path.join(os.path.dirname(sys.path[0]), 'etc', > 'r.in.wms'))
This approach broke for my script i.fusion.hpf again. The sys.path[0] is an empty string (now). I have no idea why it did work before. Is the approach in v.class.ml relevant/better/safer: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass-addons/grass7/vector/v.class.ml/v.class.ml.py?order=date#L380>? Nikos _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
