On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > 2014-11-29 23:09 GMT+01:00 Anna Petrášová <[email protected]>: > > Ok then. We should probably try to avoid too many flags in the first > place. > > yes, some modules have a lot of mutually exclusive flags. They could > be replaced by parameter with single or multiple options (in the case > that the flags are not mutually exclusive). See e.g. change in > r.reclass.area [1]. Good candidate is g.region, and many others. > I would keep g.region flags, I think this is one of the most frequently used modules in command line and GRASS users wouldn't really appreciate changing the interface (even backwards compatible). Flags are faster to type, too. So we should have a good reason for changing it. Perhaps there are better candidates for flag -> option change, I don't know now. Anna > Martin > > [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/63037 > > -- > Martin Landa > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
