Hi,
the modules can generate reStructuredText description of the interface. If
I remember correctly, it is not used anywhere now but it could be
advantageous for some cases, so I would definitively keep it. From g.parser
manual page:
reStructuredText (REST)
The flag --rest-description added to a GRASS command generates a
related help page template in reStructuredText. Example:
v.in.db --rest-description
However, --rest-description is misleading since it usually refers to REST
(Representational state transfer) rather than to reStructuredText. So, I
would suggest to change --rest-description to --rst-description. "rst" is a
suffix commonly used for reStructuredText files (used also in GRASS GIS).
Anybody against the change?
Vaclav
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
