On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Martin Landa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2014-12-29 12:26 GMT+01:00 Glynn Clements <[email protected]>: > >> it would be nice to solve it before RC1. Any objections? > I think it's not necessary, it doesn't help with anything, everybody will keep using bgcolor anyway. We already have similar cases (pcurvature, nwalkers) which where already changed and we don't plan to add another underscore there. Anna > > > Not an objection as such, but FWIW I'd still prefer a solution which > > allows background_color=, as well as bg_color=. > > what does it mean exactly? back_ground_color or ? > > Martin > > -- > Martin Landa > http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa > http://gismentors.eu/mentors/landa > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
