On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Landa wrote >> Personally I would vote for b). Any opinion? It's strategic decision, >> so please feel free to give me feedback ASAP... > > I tend to b), as we may retire the grass6x-lines with grass7.0.1. thus only > grass, grass-dev and grass-trunk-dev will remain.
I personally prefer option b too. Pietro _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
