Sorry for not responding earlier, I missed somehow this mail. On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Glynn Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any reason to retain lib/sites as a separate library, rather > than simply merging it into v.in.sites? There isn't a ctypes wrapper > for it, so I'm reasonably sure it isn't used elsewhere in GRASS. > > [Radim: does QGIS use it?]
No, QGIS does not use lib/sites. I appreciate a lot that you asked me and I'll always do in such cases. I probably missed the email because I was 'cc' only and not 'to'. Thanks Radim _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
